September 2, 2007
Process Should be on Par with Citizen Needs
Over the past seven weeks as I have knocked on doors and visited with citizens throughout district 2, I have heard much about the Twin Pines Golf Course issue. Most people are outraged that the city would even consider selling "green space." A few people suggest we ought to sell the whole thing. However, most are frustrated and confused by the process. The background information needed to connect the dots seems to be missing. People ask me again and again what I think and where I stand on this issue.


First off let me say that what I thought was a process to gain an updated and improved golf course has turned into a discussion on selling land to get money. Wow. These are two completely different issues. I'm against selling off any part of the golf course for big box or strip mall development because it doesn't fit the area. And, I'm against considering the sale of land for any purpose until a new plan for the golf course and/or green space is in place.
Even after the Twin Pines decisions are made, we'll need to make sure that we have a better way to study important matters. Here's how I think we can improve the process we use to examine community issues:
1. First, set the vision and the policy. This is City Council's area. Through its vision and policies, Council places value on those things that will lead to the type of city we want to be. In this case, the value should be on green space and recreation land. And, to some extent, on the use of land that is adjacent to green space.
2. Then, frame the issue. Set up the process so that the discussion centers on what is really important. Don't let the tail wag the dog. In this case the conversation should center on the golf course and the finances not just selling land. In fact, this process asked you and me to give up our land without knowing what we might get in return.
3. Next, get community input. Learn what people want to do with the golf course. I've heard everything from securing better drainage and having a teaching center to a driving range with a year round bubble. And yet, when I attended the Time Check information meeting there was not one display on how the golf course might be improved. I understand that just recently council moved to set up a citizen's task force to work with a developer on a golf course plan. This sounds like a step in the right direction.
4. Get expert input. Analyze staff and consultant recommendations on the product possibilities and its financial implications against council's vision for the city. In this case, examine best practices for upper Midwest private and city-owned golf courses. Study all scenarios for capital and operational costs. In short, get the facts on golf course design and financial input.
5. Craft the possible solutions. With all the information at hand, three or four possible solutions are created and community input is again sought. In the case of the golf course, this means offering several course concepts with various improvements at various financial investment points. And, of course, citizen open houses are held to explain the options and gather reactions.
6. Make the decision. After a great deal of study with plenty of facts and much citizen input, Council votes on the issue. Yes or No.
7. Monitor the situation. As with any decision, especially those made with the good of all in mind, it is important for Council to keep an eye on the follow through and the follow up.
In summary, I think that the process we use as a city to examine our options for the future is extremely important. We must have logical, reasonable and transparent methods for testing ideas and discussing and analyzing concepts. A solid process is an essential building block in creating respectful and open conversations with citizens. And that's part of what will help us make the leap from a good city to a great one.